Una visión del emprendimiento desde arquetipos sistémicos

Alejandro Valencia Arias

Resumen


La mayoría de los modelos para comprender el proceso emprendedor se basan en visiones lineales y secuenciales, que no consideran la complejidad inherente a los sistemas sociales. Por lo anterior, este artículo propone una visión sistémica que considera las no linealidades, el dinamismo de los procesos y los ciclos de retroalimentación, por medio de la estructuración de arquetipos que permitan una mejor comprensión del proceso emprendedor.

Para la elaboración de los arquetipos se realizó una revisión de literatura científica relacionada con el tema. Dicha revisión  permitió identificar variables y causalidades asociadas al proceso de creación de empresa que permitieron estructurar arquetipos para cada una de las situaciones problemáticas identificadas.

Finalmente, se concluye que una visión sistémica ofrece herramientas conceptuales y metodológicas para explicar el proceso de creación de empresas, mejorando el conocimiento de los sistemas empresariales y la efectividad en la toma de decisiones.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Acs, Z. J., y Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2-3), 109–122.

Adam, V. (2004). Systems Thinking as a Major Skill of Business Students – A New Teaching Concept at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. The Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 2(6), 43-47.

Aldrich, H. E., y Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., y Thurik, A. R. (2007). Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Edward Elgar Publishing

Blume, B. D., y Covin, J. G. (2011). Attributions to intuition in the venture founding process: Do entrepreneurs actually use intuition or just say that they do? Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 137–151.

Braun, B. W. (2002). The System Archetypes, 1-26.

Brooks, R., Green, W., Hubbard, R., Jain, D., Katehi, L., McLendon, G., … Newton, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education. Available at SSRN 1291290

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical digital libraries, 3(1), 1.

Capelleras, J.-L., & Greene, F. J. (2008). The determinants and growth implications of venture creation speed. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(4), 317–343.

Cumming, D. (2007). Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 193–235.

De Granda-Orive, J. I., Alonso-Arroyo, A., y Roig-Vázquez, F. (2011). Which data base should we use for our literature analysis? Web of Science versus SCOPUS. Archivos de Bronconeumología ((English Edition)), 47(4), 213.

Dutz, M. A., Ordover, J. A., y Willig, R. D. (2000). Entrepreneurship, access policy and economic development: lessons from industrial organization. European Economic Review, 44(4), 739–747.

Gruber, M. (2003). Research on marketing in emerging firms: key issues and open questions. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(5), 600–620.

Gruber, M. (2007). Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 782–807.

Haber, S., y Reichel, A. (2007). The cumulative nature of the entrepreneurial process: The contribution of human capital, planning and environment resources to small venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 119–145.

Harbi, S. E., y Anderson, A. R. (2010). Institutions and the shaping of different forms of entrepreneurship. Journal of Socio-economics, 39(3), 436–444.

Henrekson, M., y Stenkula, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship and public policy. En Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 595–637). Springer.

Hölzl, W. (2010). The Economics of Entrepreneurship Policy: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10(3-4), 187–197.

Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., y Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition Versus Analysis? Testing Differential Models of Cognitive Style on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and the New Venture Creation Process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 439–453.

Lichtenstein, B. B., Dooley, K. J., y Lumpkin, G. T. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 153-175.

Schwaninger, M. (2003). Modeling with archetypes: an effective approach to dealing with complexity. En Computer Aided Systems Theory-EUROCAST 2003 127–138

Senge, P. (2005). La Quinta Disciplina En La Practica/Fifth Discipline In The Practice. Ediciones Granica SA.

Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics, Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (p. 1003).

Thurik, A. R., Carree, M. A., Van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2008). Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 673–686.

Townsend, D. M., Busenitz, L. W., & Arthurs, J. D. (2010). To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 192–202.

Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 90–112.

Wolstenholme, E. (2004). Using generic system archetypes to support thinking and modelling. System Dynamics Review, 20(4), 341-356

Wolstenholme, E. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1), 7-26


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.